CARMEN J. TORTORELLO AND GRETCHEN W. TORTORELLO, APPELLANTS,
v.
E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC. AND HENRY H. HAWLING, APPELLEES
CARMEN J. TORTORELLO AND GRETCHEN W. TORTORELLO, APPELLANTS,
E.F. HUTTON & COMPANY, INC., E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC. AND HENRY H. HAWLING, APPELLEES
522 So. 2d 50
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order compelling arbitration. We reverse and remand on the authority of Gilmore v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 811 F. 2d 108 (2d Cir.1987).
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Romano v. Romano, 632 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…of marital property, or can be assigned to the spending spouse as part of that spouse’s equitable distribution. See Eckroade v. Eckroade, 570 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 597 So. 2d 835, 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Poe v. Poe, 522 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). “Dissipation” has been defined in the domestic relations context as “where one spouse uses marital funds for his or her own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irrecon…
-
Addison L. Bain v. Ingeborg K. Bain, 553 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ded for a reconsideration of the distribution of marital assets as well as the award of alimony. REVERSED AND REMANDED. DANIEL, C.J., concurs. GOSHORN, J,, concurs specially with opinion, with which DANIEL, C.J., concurs. . See also, Poe v. Poe, 522 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Laman v. Laman, 490 So. 2d 985, 986 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 500 So. 2d 544 (Fla.1986); Tuller v. Tuller, 469 So. 2d 212, 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Ente v. Ente, 442 So. 2d 232, 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); DiPrima v. DiPri…
-
Moore v. Moore, 543 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…ard of permanent periodic alimony, however, we find the disproportionate division of marital assets in Carol’s favor questionable. We have often said that a 50/50 split of marital assets is not required, but is a good starting point. See Poe v. Poe, 522 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Laman v. Laman, 490 So. 2d 985, 986 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 500 So. 2d 544 (Fla.1986), Marston v. Marston, 484 So. 2d 32, 34 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 494 So. 2d 1151 (Fla.1986); Tuller v. Tuller, 469 So. 2d 212, 213…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gilmore v. Shearson/American Express Inc., 811 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1987)