RICK GELINAS AND LINDA GELINAS, APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS,
v.
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, APPELLEE/RESPONDENT
RICK GELINAS AND LINDA GELINAS, APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS,
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, APPELLEE/RESPONDENT
522 So. 2d 104
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The respondent’s renewed motion to dismiss is granted on the authority of Paul v. City of Miami Beach, 519 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). As in both cases we certify the question presented:
WHEN A PARTY SEEKS APPELLATE REVIEW OF A NON-APPEALABLE ORDER, AND ASSUMING THAT THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS TIMELY FILED IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL, MUST THE NOTICE OF APPEAL BE FILED IN THE APPELLATE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER IN ORDER FOR THE APPELLATE COURT TO HAVE JURISDICTION TO TREAT THE NOTICE AS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI?
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stieglitz v. City Comm'n, 525 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…PER CURIAM. The respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted on the authority of Gelinas v. City of South Miami, 522 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Paul v. City of Miami Beach, 519 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). As we did in Gelinas and Paul, we certify the question presented: WHEN A PARTY SEEKS APPELLATE…
Authorities Cited
- R.S. Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Paul v. City OF Miami Beach, 519 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)