JAMES RODWELL, PETITIONER,

v.

MASSACHUSETTS.

Citator

Cited By

• PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 2051 (U.S. 2019)
  …R filed a petition for certiorari. We granted certiorari to consider "[w]hether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act." 586 U. S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 478, 202 L.Ed.2d 374 (2018). II The Hobbs Act says that an appropriate court of appeals has "exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin, set aside, suspend (in whole or in part), or to determine the validity of ... final orders of the Federal Communication Commission made revie…
• Delegates v. Golden Bethune-Hill, 139 S. Ct. 1945 (U.S. 2019)
  …v-852 (ED Va.), Doc. 246, p. 1. The House, however, filed an appeal to this Court, App. to Juris. Statement 357-358, which the State Defendants moved to dismiss for want of standing. We postponed probable jurisdiction, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 481, 202 L.Ed.2d 374 (2018), and now grant the State Defendants' motion. The House, we hold, lacks authority to displace Virginia's Attorney General as representative of the State. We further hold that the House, as a single chamber of a bicameral legislature, has no st…