ELZIE BALL, ET AL.
v.
LEBLANC, SEC., LOUISIANA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

U.S. | 2018-11-14
No. 18–162 (R46–03/OT 2018).
139 S. Ct. 499 Supreme Court of the United States (2018) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 202 L. Ed. 2d 400
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1507 (U.S. 2019)
    …plaint would be untimely under either. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, adopting the third interpretation. 887 F. 3d 1081 (C.A.11 2018). Given a conflict between the Courts of Appeals, we granted certiorari. 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 566, 202 L.Ed.2d 400 (2018). II The first question before us is whether the limitations period in § 3731(b)(2) is available in a relator-initiated suit in which the Government has declined to intervene. If so, the second question is whether the relator in such a case…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw