STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, EX REL. SHARON R. KEENAN, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALPHONSO RALPH WILLIAMS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court abused its discretion by refusing to enter a default judgment of paternity for one child when the defendant defaulted and the mother's testimony, despite an error regarding another child, confirmed paternity for the first.
[1] A party's failure to appear at a hearing after being properly served operates as an admission of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and acquiescence in the prayed-fo…
[2] A trial court abuses its discretion by refusing to enter a default judgment when all elements for such a judgment are present and the substantial, competent evidence supp…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHRS sued for paternity of two children based on mother's complaint and affidavits. The father defaulted. At the hearing, the mother testified the fath…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Paternity cases and more on FLexlaw
[*521] FRANK, Judge.
..The Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services has appealed from an order finding that the appellee, Alphonso Ralph Williams, was not the natural father of Porshea Keenan, one of Sharon R. Keenan’s two children. We reverse.
This lawsuit was instituted by HRS upon a verified complaint, accompanied by affidavits executed by Sharon Keenan, alleging that Williams was the father of her two children — Porshea and Rashad. Williams failed to answer and a default was entered and HRS moved for the entry of final judgment. At the hearing, however, which Williams failed to attend, Keenan stated that she had not carefully read the complaint and the affidavits and that Williams was in fact the father only of Porshea. Her attorney requested that the allegations concerning Rashad be stricken and that a judgment of paternity be entered only as to Porshea.
The transcript reveals that the trial judge was disturbed by the discrepancy between Keenan’s testimony and the sworn documents and he found her not to be a credible witness. Thus, he refused to enter a final judgment of paternity.
Williams’ failure to appear operated as an admission of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and as acquiescence in the prayed for relief. Williams v. Williams, 227 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969). Although Keenan admitted error in verifying that Williams had fathered Rashad, she did not waver in her assertion that Williams was, indeed, only Porshea’s father. Her testimonial admission, under oath, concerning Rashad was certainly against her own interest and in no way prejudiced Williams. All of the elements required for the entry of a default judgment were present, and the substantial, competent evidence that Williams had fathered Porshea remained uncontroverted. We hold, therefore, that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to enter a default judgment against Williams finding that he was the father of Porshea Keenan.
The order under review is reversed and this cause is remanded for the entry of final judgment consistent with this opinion.
RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.