GERALD P. MITCHELL, PETITIONER,
v.
WISCONSIN.

U.S. | 2019-01-11
No. 18–6210.
139 S. Ct. 915 Supreme Court of the United States (2019) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 202 L. Ed. 2d 642
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fort Bend Cnty. v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 1843 (U.S. 2019)
  • Food Mktg. Inst. v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S. Ct. 2356 (U.S. 2019)
  • Mitchell v. Wisconsin, 139 S. Ct. 2525 (U.S. 2019)
    …n unconscious person violates the Fourth Amendment. See 2018 WI 84, ¶15, 383 Wis.2d 192, 202-203, 914 N.W.2d 151, 155-156 (2018). The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed Mitchell's convictions, and we granted certiorari, 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 915, 202 L.Ed.2d 642 (2019), to decide "[w]hether a statute authorizing a blood draw from an unconscious motorist provides an exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement," Pet. for Cert. ii. II In considering Wisconsin's implied-consent law, we do not write on…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw