JACK HARTLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
EVELYN HARTLEY, APPELLEE
COBB, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage.
Appellant, Jack Hartley, contends that the trial court erred in determining that the parties had an equal interest in certain real property in North Carolina that was found by the trial court to be owned by appellant’s mother, and in failing to specify the type of alimony that was awarded to the wife, Evelyn Hartley. The wife concedes that error was committed as to these two points. We agree.
Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the award to the wife of the equal interest in the North Carolina proper ty and to specify the type of alimony awarded to the wife.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Futch v. State, 556 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…PER CURIAM. We deny the motion to withdraw because counsel raises in the Anders brief the meritorious issue of the imposition of costs without a determination that appellant has the ability to pay such costs. Reeves v. State, 522 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). However, having raised that issue in the brief, we see no need of requiring the public defender to submit an additional brief on this issue. Appellant raises no other issue, and a review of the sentencing hearing reveals that app…