LONNY LAWRENCE SUMPTER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1988-04-26
No. 87-3060
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and JORGENSON, JJ.
523 So. 2d 806 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, was filed while his appeal to this court (No. 87-1969) was pending and without jurisdiction having been relinquished to the trial court to consider the motion. We affirm the denial of the motion upon a holding that the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider it. State v. Meneses, 392 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1981); Bryan v. State, 470 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Marshall v. State, 428 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file such motion after disposition of his pending appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Campbell v. State, 543 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …to appellant’s right to seek post-conviction relief after disposition of the direct appeal and the return of jurisdiction to the lower court. State v. Meneses, 392 So. 2d at 907; Brown v. State, 528 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Sumpter v. State, 523 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Libby v. State, 520 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). BOOTH, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw