CAST-CRETE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE.
v.
DAVID BOLAND, INC., APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reweighing Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Defendant subcontractor appeals from a judgment for damages in favor of the general contractor in the general contractor’s suit against the subcontractor for inadequate work. We affirm.
As to defendant’s first point on appeal, we do not conclude that there was error in construing the contract as not requiring the condition precedent which defendant contends was required.
As to defendant’s second point on appeal, we conclude that we are being asked to reweigh sufficient evidence which we are not entitled to do. See Tsavaris v. NCNB National Bank of Florida, 497 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
As to the point on cross-appeal, we also affirm. We do not conclude that there was error in the exclusion of certain proffered evidence.
Affirmed.
RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pilkington PLC v. Metro Corp., 526 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…., 522 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (vague, jumbled, and incomplete responses to discovery requests do not justify dismissal, where appellant made a good faith effort to comply with discovery orders); Morales v. Four Star Poultry & Provision Co., 523 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (where some materials already in proponent’s possession and interrogated party less than forthcoming in producing other documents, striking of pleadings too severe for infraction); Zafirakopoulous v. South Miami Int’l Crabhouse Co…
-
State Dep't OF Revenue v. Aguirre, 705 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…for not producing either a nonexistent item or an item of which Aguirre was already in possession. See A Aaable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Able Bail Bond, Inc., 626 So. 2d 1105, 1106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Morales v. Four Star Poultry and Provision Co., Inc., 523 So. 2d 1183, 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). With regard to the other items, the failure to produce the single DNA gel form (which was in fact later produced) was mere inadvertence and did not in any way prejudice Aguirre. The same is true with regard to the policies…
Authorities Cited
- Tsavaris v. NCNB Nat'l Bank OF Fla. & Neofytos Theodore Tsangaris, 497 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)