ROBERT SPARKS
v.
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION

U.S. | 2019-09-25
No. 18-9227 (19A109)
140 S. Ct. 6 Supreme Court of the United States (2019)
Also reported at: 204 L. Ed. 2d 1192

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A bailiff wore a tie embroidered with a syringe to express support for the death penalty during jury deliberations in Robert Sparks' capital murder trial, raising concerns about judicial impartiality. The Supreme Court denied certiorari after the state habeas court found insufficient evidence that the jury saw the tie, though Justice Sotomayor expressed concern about the troubling conduct and urged judges to remove such items or officers from jury presence in future cases.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.

Statement of Justice SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.

The allegations presented in this petition are disturbing. On the day the jury began punishment deliberations in petitioner Robert Sparks' capital murder trial, one of the bailiffs on duty in the courtroom wore a black tie embroidered with a white syringe-a tie that he admitted he wore to express his support for the death penalty.

That an officer of the court conducted himself in such a manner is deeply troubling. Undoubtedly, such "distinctive, identifiable attire may affect a juror's judgment." Estelle v. Williams , 425 U.S. 501, 504-505, 96 S.Ct. 1691, 48 L.Ed.2d 126 (1976). The state habeas court, however, conducted an evidentiary hearing but did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that the jury saw the tie. I therefore do not disagree with the denial of certiorari. I nevertheless hope that presiding judges aware of this kind of behavior would see fit to intervene in future cases by completely removing the offending item or court officer from the jury's presence. Only this will ensure the "very dignity and decorum of judicial proceedings" they are entrusted to uphold. Illinois v. Allen , 397 U.S. 337, 344, 90 S.Ct. 1057, 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970). The stakes-life in this case, liberty in many others-are too high to allow anything less.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw