FREDDIE R. TAYLOR, APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1988-05-06
No. 88-62
ERVIN, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
524 So. 2d 719 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1988)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant has stated that the only issue to be raised in this appeal is whether the sentence imposed is an illegal departure from the recommended sentence under the guidelines, and because the state acknowledges that appellant’s sentence is an improper sentence in excess of the guidelines, appellant’s sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for resentencing. Compare Rivers v. State, 513 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hope v. State, 513 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

ERVIN, BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw