NIDAL KHALID NASRALLAH, PETITIONER

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Citator

Cited By

• Seila LAW LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)
• Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 1062 (U.S. 2020)
  …nt's interpretation. Id. , at 300, 121 S.Ct. 2271. Indeed, the meaning of the Suspension Clause and its applicability to removal proceedings remain open questions. See Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam , --- U.S. ----, 140 S.Ct. 427, 205 L.Ed.2d 244 (2019) (granting certiorari). In explaining its decision, the Court in St. Cyr merely asserted that the Suspension Clause "protects the writ as it existed in 1789" and noted that "there is substantial evidence ... that pure questions of law " were…
• Nidal Khalid Nasrallah v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 1683 (U.S. 2020)