STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
CHRISTINE B. URF, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1988-05-11
Nos. 87-1721, 88-797
RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
524 So. 2d 1118 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The state seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court granting Christine Urf’s motion to seal records. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the court’s agreement to seal its own records. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 336 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1976). However, we do agree that the court exceeded its authority in ordering the sealing by law enforcement agencies of arrest and criminal history records, because Urf, having been adjudged guilty of the offenses in question, did not qualify for such extraordinary relief. §§ 943.058(2) and 943.058(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly the petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part and denied in part, and the circuit court is directed to correct its order of June 3, 1987, consistent with this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Russell v. Miami Herald Publ'g Co., 570 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
    …e as allowing a court to seal or expunge its own records, using its sound discretion. This court has recognized that a court has discretion to seal its own records even though a defendant had been adjudged guilty of those offenses. See State v, Urf, 524 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We recognize that our interpretation of the statute in Urf, which we reaffirm today, conflicts with the fourth district’s opinion in State v. Herstik, 475 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The next inquiry is the appropriate stan…
  • State v. Pena, 593 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …e as allowing a court to seal or expunge its own records, using its sound discretion. This court has recognized that a court has discretion to seal its own records even though a defendant had been adjudged guilty of those offenses. See State v. Urf, 524 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.2d DCA 1988). We recognize that our interpretation of the statute in Urf which we reaffirm today, conflicts with the fourth district’s opinion in State v. Herstik, 475 So. 2d 1268 (Fla.4th DCA 1985). 570 So. 2d at 982. In the earlier case of…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw