WINDHAM KEITH BROOKER, APPELLANT,
v.
TARRANT MANUFACTURING CO., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
WINDHAM KEITH BROOKER, APPELLANT,
TARRANT MANUFACTURING CO., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
524 So. 2d 1161
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS, J., concur.
STONE, J., dissents with opinion.
Dissent
STONE, Judge,
dissenting.
I would reverse this summary judgment under the authority of Auburn Machine Works Co. v. Jones, 366 So. 2d 1167 (Fla.1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Futo Charles v. State, 204 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…is true that Florida’s appellate courts have held that a trial court may not impose a departure sentence simply because the court believes it will serve as a deterrent to others or that it will send a message to the community. E.g., Wilson v. State, 524 So. 2d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Mitchell v. State, 507 So. 2d 686, 688 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Appellate courts have also held that, in juvenile cases, the trial court may not depart from the recommended sentence of the Department of Juvenile Justice (“DJJ”)…
Authorities Cited
- Auburn Mach. Works Co., Inc. v. Jones, 366 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 1979)