WILLIAM CHARLES CARTER APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM CHARLES CARTER APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
525 So. 2d 424
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Carter appeals his conviction and sentence for dealing in stolen property. The state concedes that Carter’s sentencing guidelines scoresheet erroneously includes a prior conviction more than ten years old in violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(b). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for correction of the scoresheet and resentencing. In all other respects, the case is affirmed.
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
BOOTH, THOMPSON and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. V.E. Whitehurst & Sons, Inc., 636 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…ability cases. Id. The contracts in Charles Poe Masonry and Cox Cable contained no such language. Cases such as R.C.A. Corp. v. Pennwalt Corp., 577 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Enforcement Security Corp., 525 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 525 So. 2d 878 (Fla.1988), and the cases cited therein have found indemnity provisions very similar to the provision in the instant case sufficient to express a clear and unequivocal intent that the indemnitor inten…
-
Gulf Power Co. v. COX Cable Corp., 570 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. Stewart, 272 So. 2d 507 (Fla.1973). The degree of specificity required for indemnification in cases of joint negligence is, however, less stringent. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Enforcement Security Corp., 525 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). The indemnification language in the instant case is similar to the language in United Parcel Service of America, Inc. which this court held was sufficient to sustain indemnification in cases where the parties are jointly liable…
-
R.C.A. Corp. v. Pennwalt Corp., 577 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…ation clause clearly and unambiguously indemnifies RCA under the circumstances of this case. See generally, L.M. Duncan & Sons, Inc. v. City of [*622] Clearwater, 478 So. 2d 816 (Fla.1985); United Parcel Serv. of Am., Inc. v. Enforcement Sec. Corp., 525 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So. 2d 878 (Fla.1988). Pennwalt contends that the phrase “to any person” does not include its agents, such as Ritsema, but refers only to third parties.2 We do not agree. As applied to the case at hand, the p…