U. C. DURHAM, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
D. H. EDWARDS, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Fla. | 1904-06-01
48 Fla. 324 Florida Supreme Court (1904) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against-the plaintiff in error. There jvas judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant takes writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.

Decision

Per Curiam.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nicakbud Barco v. Doyle, 50 Fla. 488 (Fla. 1905)
    …ties and otherwise attempts to exercise control of all of such lands,” Hughes v. Hannah, 39 Fla. 365, which renders nugatory the other allegation, whatever of force it might otherwise have “that the lands are wild and unimproved.” Durham v. Edwards, 48 Fla. 324, 38 South. Rep. 926, and authorities cited therein. It is not even claimed that the bill can be sustained as a bill for partition, against which' numerous objections might be urged; but it was sustained, as appears from an opinion filed by the Circu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw