ROBERT CAHILL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT CAHILL, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
526 So. 2d 220
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in all respects. However, we remand to the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that conforms to the trial court’s oral pronouncements: that Count 1, violation of probation for changing residence without consent of probation officer, was dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence; that Count 2, violation of condition of probation for failing to submit monthly reports, was violated in the month of May only; that Count 5, violation of condition of probation for uttering a forged instrument, was violated; and Count 6, violation of probation for grand theft, was violated.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Siroky v. State, 532 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…oncedes this necessity for correction. The appeal is otherwise without merit. Accordingly, we affirm, but remand this cause to the trial court for the purpose of conforming the written order to the verbal pronouncement pursuant to Cahill v. State, 526 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). AFFIRMED AND REMANDED. DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.…