JEFF LATHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD LAWSON AND RHONDA LAWSON, APPELLEE
JEFF LATHAM, APPELLANT,
DONALD LAWSON AND RHONDA LAWSON, APPELLEE
526 So. 2d 744
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla.1983); HZJ, Inc. v. Wysocki, 511 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Watson v. Peskoe, 407 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Freeman v. Humana, Inc., 501 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 298 (Fla.1987).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. SUN Bank/Miami, N.A., 609 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…claimant was not a “known or reasonably ascertainable creditor”. In re Estate of Vickery, 564 So. 2d 555, 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Public Health Trust v. Estate of Jara, 526 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); North Shore Medical Ctr., Inc. v. Szilvassy, 526 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Finally, the Pollution Control Act was never pled, and therefore, was not applicable. Even if the Act was applicable, however, it has no specific limitation period. Consequently, the Act would be subject to the general statute of…
-
Lawson v. Latham, 564 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…by defendants, the trial court struck defendants’ pleadings and entered a default against defendants on all claims asserted by the Lawsons. Jeffrey Latham, one of the defendants, appealed the order of default. This court affirmed. Latham v. Lawson, 526 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). At the close of the jury trial on the issue of damages,1 the trial court granted defendant Latham’s motion for a directed verdict on the grounds that the Lawsons had made no showing that La-tham’s conduct was knowing, willful, or…
Authorities Cited
- Mercer v. J.D. Raine, Sr., 443 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 1983)
- Watson v. Peskoe, 407 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Freeman v. Humana, Inc., 501 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- HZJ, Inc. v. Wysocki, 511 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)