REMINGTON SMITH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
REMINGTON SMITH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
49 Fla. 33
Florida Supreme Court (1905)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Cockrell, J.
Remington 'Smith' was indicted, tried and convicted of murder in the first degree of Hattie Oder Smith, and on a recommendation for mercy was sentenced to a life term in the State prison. He has prosecuted this ' writ of error and assigns for error the single proposition as to the sufficiency of the evidence.
The defense below introduced no witnesses and the evidence is wholly that of the State: This has received the most careful consideration by this court and we find nothing therein to justify us in setting aside the verdict and it is, therefore, affirmed.
Taylor and Hocker JJ. concur. Whitield C. J. and Carter and Shackleford JJ. concur in the opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chancey v. State, 54 Fla. 20 (Fla. 1907)…that it is amply sufficient to support the verdict. We find nothing which would warrant or justify us in setting the verdict aside, therefore the judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered, at the cost of the county of Lee. See Smith v. State, 49 Fla. 33, 38 South. Rep. 599, and Tatum v. State, 49 Fla. 67, 38 South. Rep. 601. Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur. Taylor, Hocicer and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.…