URBAIN JOSEPH SAVARIA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substantive Offense cases and more on FLexlaw
THREADGILL, Judge.
The appellant challenges the trial court’s revocation of his community control and sentence to three and one-half years in prison for violating numerous conditions of his community control. We find the testimony elicited from the appellant’s probation officer sufficient to support the trial court’s finding that multiple conditions of community control had been violated. We therefore, affirm the revocation of community control.
We, however, agree with the appellant that the trial court erred in including the substantive offense of burglary as a violation. The court specifically stated on the record that it would not consider this as a violation of community control. See Robinson v. State, 468 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Thus, the revocation order should be modified to delete this charge. Accordingly, we affirm the order revoking the appellant’s community control and subsequent sentence but remand for correction of the order of revocation. See Brouillett v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Affirmed in part; remanded in part.
RYDER, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Garcia v. State, 854 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…possession theory it is necessary to prove “(1) the defendant’s ability to exercise dominion and control over the [drugs]; (2) his knowledge of the presence of the [drugs]; and (3) his awareness of the illicit nature of the [drugs].” Elias v. State, 526 So. 2d 1014, 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). “[K]nowledge of contraband found within an automobile ...' is generally inferred or presumed from one’s exclusive possession [of the automobile] unless and until proven otherwise.” State v. Paleveda, 745 So. 2d 1026, 1028…
-
Campbell v. State, 558 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…e defendant knew the contraband was in his presence; and (3) the defendant knew of the illicit nature of the contraband. Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250, 252 (Fla.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1209, 103 S.Ct. 3541, 77 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1983); Elias v. State, 526 So. 2d 1014, 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). See also State v. Brider, 386 So. 2d 818, 819 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 392 So. 2d 1372 (Fla.1980) (“Possession is defined as having personal charge or exercising the right of ownership, management or control over the a…
-
Pearce v. State, 538 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…are distinguishing facts presented in this case. Accordingly, we affirm Pearce’s convictions for trafficking in cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. AFFIRMED. CAMPBELL, C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur. . Elias v. State, 526 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).…
Authorities Cited
- Robinson v. State, 468 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- Brouillett v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Bloyd v. State, 373 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)