MATTHEW F. ROSS
v.
TURQUOISE BAY RESORT LLC AND ROBERT RYAN KNIGHT

M.D. Fla. | 2026-01-06
No. 2:25-cv-958
2026 FFL 358 District Court, M.D. Florida (2026) Positive Treatment

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Court dismisses the supplemental complaint because it is a shotgun pleading, but grants the plaintiff leave to amend.


Headnotes

[1] A pleading is considered a "shotgun pleading" when it fails to provide a defendant with adequate notice of the claims against them and the grounds upon which each claim r…

[2] Shotgun pleadings violate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) by failing to present a short and plain statement of the claim showing an entitlement to relief.

Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Federal Rule 8 requires "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."”

Establishes the pleading standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) that governs complaint drafting.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a supplemental complaint which the court found to be a shotgun pleading. The complaint improperly adopted prior allegations and re…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

and ROBERT RYAN KNIGHT, Defendants.

Case No.: 2:25-cv-958-SPC-DNF

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court after review of the Supplemental Complaint. (Doc. 5). Because the complaint is a shotgun pleading, the Court dismisses it without prejudice and with leave to amend.

Federal Rule 8 requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Shotgun pleadings violate this rule "by fail[ing] to give the defendant adequate notice of the claims against them and the grounds upon which each claim rests." Weiland v. Palm City Beach Cnty. Sheriff's Office, 792 F. 3d 1316, 1321– 23 (11th Cir. 2015) (defining the four types of shotgun pleadings).

The complaint is a shotgun pleading because it contains “multiple counts where each count adopts the allegations of all preceding counts, causing each successive count to carry all that came before and the last count to be a combination of the entire complaint.” Id. In each count, Plaintiff Matthew F. Ross “repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation contained above as if fully set forth herein.” (See, e.g., Doc. 5 ¶¶ 17, 22, 28). Plaintiff must incorporate or separately allege under each count only the facts that are relevant to that count.

Additionally, Plaintiff has requested that the Court award “Plaintiffs and the other members of the Class pre-judgment and post-judgment interest[.]" (Id. at 7). But there is only one plaintiff, and this is not a putative class action. Accordingly, Plaintiff should correct his Prayer for Relief so it is consistent with the parties in this case.

In non-merits dismissals on shotgun pleading grounds, the Eleventh Circuit requires district courts to allow a litigant one chance to remedy such deficiencies. See, e.g., Wagner v. First Horizon Pharm. Corp., 464 F. 3d 1273, 1280 (11th Cir. 2006). This is Plaintiff’s chance.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) The Supplemental Complaint (Doc. 5) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

(2) On or before January 20, 2026, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint that corrects the deficiencies outlined above. Failure to

comply may result in the Court dismissing and closing this case without further notice.

DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on January 6, 2026.

Sheri Polster Chappell SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw