VANESSA ADELA ROMERO REYES
v.
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC., TRANSUNION LLC AND EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Plaintiff's motion to compel complete and unredacted discovery responses from three credit reporting agencies was denied without prejudice for procedural defects, including failure to attach discovery documents and failure to comply with the Standing Order on Discovery Motions.
The motion to compel is denied without prejudice because it fails to comply with the Standing Order on Discovery Motions, specifically by not attaching the discovery at issue and not demonstrating adequate conferral through telephone or in-person communication.
“Plaintiff may not incorporate prior filings by reference. See Local Rule 3.01(h).”
Establishes the procedural defect regarding incorporation by reference of prior filings
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Vanessa Adela Romero Reyes filed a renewed motion to compel complete and unredacted discovery responses from Defendants Experian, TransUnion…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standing Order On Discovery Motions cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Compel Complete and Unredacted Discovery Responses. Doc. No. 53; see also Doc. Nos. 54, 55. On review, the motion (Doc. No. 53) is DENIED without prejudice, for failure to comply with the Standing Order on Discovery Motions. Doc. No. 44. Specifically, the motion does not attach any of the discovery at issue, and indicates that Plaintiff conferred with Defendant TransUnion LLC by written correspondence, rather than via telephone or in person. Doc. Nos. 53, 55; see also Doc. No. 44 ¶¶ 1, 3. Plaintiff may not incorporate prior filings by reference. See Local Rule 3.01(h).
Plaintiff is advised that any renewed motions must comply with all applicable Local Rules, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Court orders. See Moon v. Newsome, 863 F. 2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989) (pro se litigants are "subject to the relevant law and rules of court, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure").
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on January 5, 2026.
Uslis Heyan Price LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
-2-
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Moon v. Lanson Newsome, 863 F.2d 835 (11th Cir. 1989)
- Flores-Dominguez v. United States, 493 U.S. 863 (U.S. 1989)