AL HAMMAN
v.
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In a procedural order issued during case management in an employment or civil rights matter filed by Al Hamman against the University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, the District Court granted plaintiff's request for email notification and extended the deadline to respond to defendant's motion for a more definite statement.
Plaintiff's request for email notification was granted, and plaintiff was added to CM/ECF with email at [email protected]. The deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement was extended to January 5, 2026.
[1] A party's oral request to receive case notifications via email may be granted by the court.
[2] A party may consent to service of court documents by email.
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Plaintiff's oral request to receive case notifications via email (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED.”
Establishes the court's grant of plaintiff's request for electronic notification through CM/ECF.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis is a civil action pending in the Middle District of Florida. The case is subject to the IDEAL Program for efficient litigation. A case management…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Case Management Conference cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause comes before the Court following a Case Management Conference pursuant to the Inexpensive Determination, Efficient, and Abbreviated Litigation (IDEAL) Program, held today. Doc. Nos. 5, 9, 11, 13, 15. As discussed with the parties at the Conference, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's oral request to receive case notifications via email (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. See Moore v. Adventist Health Sys. Sunbelt Healthcare Corp., No. 6:23-cv-1163-PGB-DCI, 2023 WL 4947933, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2023). The Clerk of Court is directed to add Plaintiff's email address, [email protected], to CM/ECF and ensure that Plaintiff receives Notices of Electronic Filings. The Court also notes Plaintiff's consent at today's hearing to service by email of all court
documents from Defendant going forward. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E), (F). Plaintiff must still file all documents with the Court via U.S. Mail or hand delivery.
2. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, the parties shall either file a fully executed Stipulated Consent to the IDEAL Program and Magistrate Judge Authority signed by all parties (unilateral consents should not be filed) or submit the standard Case Management Report. See Doc. No. 54.
3. The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Respondent's Partially Unopposed Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. No. 8) is extended up to and including January 5, 2026. Plaintiff is reminded that failure to respond by this deadline will result in the motion being deemed unopposed in all respects.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on December 15, 2025.
Uslis Hexan Price LESLIE HOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
-2-