TRACEY YOUNGBLOOD-MCDANIEL AND ENDPOINT CAPITAL, LLC
v.
DIAGNOSTIC BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court adopts the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, denying the plaintiffs' motion to supplement judgment and the defendant's motion to vacate default judgment.
[1] When no objection is filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation within the prescribed time, the district court reviews the report for clear error rather than…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation denying the plaintiffs' motion to supplement judgment and the defendant's motion to vacate def…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Lindsay S. Griffin, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on October 17, 2025. (Doc. 50). Judge Griffin recommends that Plaintiffs' "Amended Motion to Supplement Judgment” and “Defendant's Motion to Vacate Default Judgment” (Docs. 33; 48) be denied. No party has objected, and the time to object has expired.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the
Page 1 of 3
magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Comby v. Davis, 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F. 2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982).
Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Griffin's wellreasoned report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
(1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 50) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.
Page 2 of 3
(2) Plaintiffs' "Amended Motion to Supplement Judgment” and "Defendant's Motion to Vacate Default Judgment” (Docs. 33; 48) are DENIED as set forth in the report and recommendation.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 2nd day of December, 2025.
TOM BARBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 3 of 3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)