ALL TEAM FRANCHISE CORPORATION
v.
CTS ENTERPRISES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
All Team Franchise Corporation and CTS Enterprises, Inc. resolved their dispute through mediation and settlement. The court approved their joint motion for dismissal and retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement through September 30, 2027.
The court granted the joint motion for dismissal with prejudice of all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement through September 30, 2027, and ordered each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs.
[1] A court may retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement when the parties consent to such retention.
[2] A settlement agreement resolving all disputes in a litigation may be enforced by the court that presided over the litigation.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The parties represent in their motion that they resolved their dispute during a mediation presided over by the undersigned and that they have subsequently entered into a written settlement agreement reflecting the material terms of their resolution.”
Establishes that the parties reached settlement through mediation and entered into a written agreement
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe parties engaged in a dispute that proceeded to litigation in the Middle District of Florida. During mediation presided over by the judge, the part…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retention Of Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Final Order of Dismissal. (Doc. 57). The parties represent in their motion that they resolved their dispute during a mediation presided over by the undersigned and that they have subsequently entered into a written settlement agreement reflecting the material terms of their resolution. Id. The parties now request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Gardian Life Insurance Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381–82 (1994). Upon due consideration of the matter, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Final Order of Dismissal (Doc. 57) is granted.
2. The parties shall comply with the terms of their settlement agreement.
3. All claims asserted by the parties against any of the parties in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
4. All counterclaims and affirmative defenses that were or are now pending or that could have been asserted in this ligation by the above identified Defendants, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
5. The parties shall each bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.
6. By consent of the Parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the settlement agreement through September 30, 2027. SO ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 26th day of September 2025. U Nica Ast.
HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER P. TUITE
United States Magistrate Judge Copies to: Counsel of record