KAZIMIERZ SIEDLECKI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KAZIMIERZ SIEDLECKI, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
527 So. 2d 234
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We treat the appellant’s brief as a petition for writ of certiorari. After reviewing this matter, we deny the petition.
DOWNEY, LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Conrad v. Eng'g Int'l, Inc., 530 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…with an accident, as alleged, or with the claimant’s employment with Engineering International, Inc. In the context of the record supporting these findings, we do not find the order to be fatally deficient. Cf. Roseboom v. H.T. Constructors, Inc., 527 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). AFFIRMED. ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. . The briefs do not reference the mandate of Section 440.15(5)(a), Florida Statutes, against apportionment of temporary compensation and medical benefits for the apparent reason tha…
-
Gregory v. Crum Staffing & Broadspire, 3 So. 3d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…y-day rule need not detail every facet of the injury sustained. Rather, it is sufficient that the employer have notice of an injury. See Alfonso v. Mac Dinton’s Rest., 515 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); see also Roseboom v. H.T. Constructors, Inc., 527 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Winter Park Mem’l Hosp. v. Brown, 452 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Based on the foregoing, the JCC erroneously concluded Claimant failed to satisfy the actual knowledge exception to the thirty-day notice requirement in secti…