ROBINSON
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The District Court adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation and granted Robinson's unopposed motion for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of $2,776.56 against the Commissioner of Social Security.
The Court granted Plaintiff's unopposed motion for attorney's fees under the EAJA, awarding $2,776.56 in attorney's fees, payable by the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment of fees.
[1] A district court must conduct a de novo determination of portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made.
[2] When no objection is filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, a district court reviews the report for clear error.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.”
Establishes the standard of review a district court applies when reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRobinson filed an unopposed motion for attorney's fees under the EAJA against the Commissioner of Social Security. The magistrate judge reviewed the m…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clear Error Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Lindsay S. Griffin, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on September 8, 2025. (Doc. 20). Judge Griffin recommends that "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act" (Doc. 19) be granted. Specifically, Judge Griffin recommends that Plaintiff be awarded $2,776.56 in attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”).
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F. 2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F. 2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright,
677 F. 2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982).
Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Griffin's report and recommendation, the Court adopts the report and recommendation. Consequently, Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees in the amount of $2,776.56 under the EAJA is granted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
(1) The report and recommendation (Doc. 20) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.
(2) "Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act" (Doc. 19) is hereby GRANTED.
(3) Plaintiff is entitled to an award of $2,776.56 in attorney's fees. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, Defendant must pay the fees to Plaintiffs counsel in accord with Plaintiffs assignment of fees.
(4) The Clerk is directed to prepare an amended judgment that reflects the award of attorney's fees, as set forth herein.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 10th day of September, 2025.
Jup. Bul
TOM BARBER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982)
- Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198 (4th Cir. 1983)