DORDOLLE
v.
ATLANTIC BAY MORTGAGE GROUP, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court dismissed plaintiff Lukenson Dordolle's complaint against Atlantic Bay Mortgage Group, LLC as frivolous, finding it replete with sovereign citizen legal theories that have been consistently rejected. The complaint was dismissed without leave to amend, and the plaintiff was warned of potential sanctions if similar filings continue.
The court held that the complaint is patently frivolous and must be dismissed without leave to amend. The court rejected the sovereign citizen legal theories as utterly frivolous and a waste of the court's time.
[1] A complaint that is incomprehensible and uses meaningless verbiage associated with the sovereign citizen movement is subject to dismissal as frivolous.
[2] Arguments and legal theories espoused by adherents of the sovereign citizen movement have been consistently rejected as frivolous and a waste of court resources.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Plaintiff's complaint is incomprehensible and replete with "the legal-sounding but meaningless verbiage commonly used by adherents to the so-called sovereign citizen movement."”
Establishes the court's primary basis for dismissal—that the complaint employs sovereign citizen rhetoric lacking legal coherence.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Lukenson Dordolle filed a complaint on July 31, 2025 against Atlantic Bay Mortgage Group, LLC in federal district court in the Middle Distri…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sovereign Citizen Movement cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Lukenson Dordolle's complaint, filed on July 31, 2025. (Doc. 1). After review of the complaint, court file, and record, the Court finds as follows:
Plaintiff's complaint is incomprehensible and replete with “the legal-sounding but meaningless verbiage commonly used by adherents to the so-called sovereign citizen movement." See Sealey v. Branch Banking and Trust Co., No. 2:17cv785- MHT-SMD, 2019 WL 1434065, at *2 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 21, 2019). The arguments and legal theories espoused by sovereign citizens have been consistently rejected as “utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned tax dollars." See Young v. PNC Bank, N.A., No. 3:16cv298/RV/EMT, 2018 WL 1251920, at *2 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2018) (citing Roach v. Arrisi, No. 8:15-cv-2547-T-33AЕР, 2016 WL 8943290, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 7,
Page 1 of 2
2016)). This case is patently frivolous and due to be dismissed, without leave to amend.
Plaintiff is warned that if he continues to file frivolous cases of this nature in this Court, he may be subject to sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c), including monetary sanctions or injunctive relief directing the Clerk to not accept future filings by Plaintiff without first obtaining prior leave of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:
1. Plaintiff Lukenson Dordolle's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS, without leave to amend.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Tampa, Florida, on this 5th day of August, 2025.
hp.Bl TOM BARBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Longs Bey v. Sec'y, Dep't of Treas. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…laintiff's complaint is incomprehensible and replete with "the legal-sounding but meaningless verbiage commonly used by adherents to the so-called sovereign citizen movement.” See Sealey v. Branch Banking and Trust Co., Case No.: 2:17cv785- MHT-SMD, 2019 WL 1434065, at *2 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 21, 2019). The arguments and legal theories espoused by sovereign citizens have been consistently rejected as “utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned ta…1 / 3
-
Watkins v. Conn's Appliances, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…s, and it notes that Plaintiffs filings have been replete with "the legal-sounding but meaningless verbiage commonly used by adherents to the so-called sovereign citizen movement." See Sealey v. Branch Banking and Trust Co., No.: 2:17cv785-MHT- SMD, 2019 WL 1434065, at *2 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 21, 2019). The arguments and legal theories espoused by sovereign citizens have been consistently rejected as “utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned ta…1 / 3
-
Alexander v. Tedio (M.D. Fla. 2024)…s: Alexander's complaint is incomprehensible and replete with "the legal- sounding but meaningless verbiage commonly used by adherents to the so-called sovereign citizen movement."¹ See Sealey v. Branch Banking and Trust Co., No. 2:17cv785-MHT-SMD, 2019 WL 1434065, at *2 (M.D. Ala. Feb. 21, 2019). The arguments and legal theories espoused by sovereign citizens have been consistently rejected as "utterly frivolous, patently ludicrous, and a waste of . . . the court's time, which is being paid by hard-earned ta…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence