GS HOLISTIC, LLC
v.
MELLOWMOOD SMOKESHOP
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting in part and denying in part the motion for default judgment.
Plaintiff GS Holistic moved for default judgment against defendants Trina Tran and Camvan Tran. A Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Counterfeit Goods cases and more on FLexlaw
In a July 2, 2025, Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 56), the United States Magistrate Judge recommends granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff GS Holistic's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Trina Tran and Camvan Tran, (Doc. 51).
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F. 2d 1567, 1576 (11th
Cir. 1992). The district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even absent an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
In the absence of any objection and after reviewing the factual allegations and legal conclusions, I adopt the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes.
2. The Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 51) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
3. The Clerk is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT which shall read
“Judgment is entered in favor of GS Holistic and against Camvan Tran and Trina Tran on Counts I and II, with statutory damages as to Count I in the amount of $100,000 and $532 in costs, with interest accruing at the current per annum legal rate, for which sum let execution issue."
2
4. Defendants Trina Tran and Camvan Tran and their agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, representatives, successor companies, related companies, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from the following: Importing, exporting, making, manufacturing, reproducing, assembling, using, acquiring, purchasing, offering, selling, transferring, brokering, consigning, distributing, storing, shipping, licensing, developing, displaying, delivering, marketing, advertising, or promoting the counterfeit “G Pen" products, meaning products bearing the “G Pen” trademarks (U.S. Trademark Registration Numbers 4,462,090 and 4,466,586), counterfeits, copies, or colorful imitations thereof.
5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on August 5, 2025.
Kathryn Kimball Mizelle United States District Judge
3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Durham Eldon Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir. 1992)
- In re Mad Toyz III, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2026)