MARK R. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
CINDY WILLIAMS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1988-07-01
No. 87-1163
MILLS, SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
527 So. 2d 943 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Tronconi v. Tronconi, 466 So. 2d 203 (Fla.1985) and Abbe v. Abbe, 475 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1985).

MILLS, SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Poole v. The Lowell Dunn Co., 573 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …uisance to a reasonable man, sensitive people are not entitled to a recovery by virtue of their “hypersensitivity.” This instruction was incorrect because, under Florida law, “the tort feasor takes the plaintiff as he finds him.” See Silva v. Stein, 527 So. 2d 943, 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). A plaintiff’s “hypersensitivity” does not affect the causal relationship between the defendant’s conduct and the plaintiff’s damages. The defendant’s initial wrongful conduct is the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damages…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw