CLIFFT, JR.
v.
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LEE COUNTY

M.D. Fla. | 2025-05-15
No. 2:25-cv-345
2025 FFL 12792 District Court, M.D. Florida (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Pro se plaintiff Johnny Amon Clifft, Jr. sought leave to access the Court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF) in his employment discrimination case against the School District of Lee County. The court denied the motion, finding no extenuating circumstances justified waiving standard CM/ECF procedures.


Holding

Pro se litigants are generally denied access to electronic filing unless extenuating circumstances exist to justify waiving CM/ECF procedures. Here, no extenuating circumstances were shown or argued, and therefore the motion for leave to access the electronic filing system was denied.


Key Quotes

“Pro se litigants are generally denied access to electronic filing unless extenuating circumstances exist to justify waiving CM/ECF procedures.”

Establishes the governing legal standard for CM/ECF access by pro se parties

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Johnny Amon Clifft, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed an employment discrimination suit against the School District of Lee County. He subsequent…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

In this employment case, pro se Plaintiff Johnny Amon Clifft, Jr. sues the School District of Lee County for discrimination. (Doc. 1.) [fn 1] Now pending is Plaintiff's motion for leave to access the Court's electronic filing system. (Doc. 4.)

The motion is DENIED. “Pro se litigants are generally denied access to electronic filing unless extenuating circumstances exist to justify waiving CM/ECF procedures.” Huminski v. Vermont, No. 2:13-cv-692-FtM-29, 2014 WL 169848, *4 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 15, 2014); see also McMahon v. Cleveland Clinic Found. Police Dep't, 455 F. App'x 874, 878 (11th Cir. 2011) (affirming denial of CM/ECF access for pro se litigants). No extenuating circumstances have been shown (or even argued) here. To the extent Plaintiff believes

electronic filing will help him access documents in the case, he can already submit materials electronically through the Web Portal on the Court's website: https://www.flmd. uscourts.gov/electronic-document-submission-webportal.

ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on May 15, 2025.

Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

[fn 1]: Unless otherwise indicated, all internal quotation marks, citations, case history, and alterations have been omitted in this and later citations.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw