JUNE ROSE WHITE, APPELLANT,
v.
ARTHUR H. WHITE, APPELLEE
JUNE ROSE WHITE, APPELLANT,
ARTHUR H. WHITE, APPELLEE
527 So. 2d 971
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The wife appeals from a final judgment of dissolution. We reverse and remand with direction that the trial court enter a subsequent order which reflects its consideration of the husband’s private pension plan and its determination based upon that consideration in accordance with Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1986), and which increases the future permanent alimony of the wife, the record compelling an increased award.
GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents without opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carlson v. Carlson, 549 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…before their separation. It was error to make no evidentiary findings on the value of the pension plans, and to make no finding as to the proper date for determining valuations. Bushore v. Bushore, 531 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); White v. White, 527 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Reversed and remanded.…
-
Stringfellow v. Stringfellow, 529 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…on that the trial court enter a supplemental order reflecting its consideration of those assets, and its determination based upon that consideration in accordance with Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1986). See also White v. White, 527 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). We find no reversible error in the trial court’s award to appellee, pursuant to appellant’s agreement in open court, of exclusive use of the marital home upon the condition that appellee make all mortgage and upkeep payments t…
Authorities Cited
- Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1986)