STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
v.
DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 73.224.179.247

M.D. Fla. | 2025-04-08
No. 3:25-CV-232
2025 FFL 9270 District Court, M.D. Florida (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to subpoena an ISP for subscriber information, finding good cause shown.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, moved for leave to subpoena Comcast for the name and address of a subscriber associated with a specific IP address o…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Order

In this BitTorrent litigation, Strike3 Holdings, LLC, moves for leave to subpoena Comcast Cable or Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, before discovery begins. Doc. 7 (motion); Docs. 7-1 to 7-3 (supporting declarations); Doc. 7-4 (proposed subpoena). [fn 1] From Comcast, Strike3 wants the name and address of the subscriber associated with IP address 73.224.179.247 on February 5, 2025, at 14:47:30. Doc. 7-4 at 1, 4.

Unless authorized by a court order, parties generally cannot begin discovery until after the case-management conference. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d). Courts have permitted early discovery upon a showing of good cause. See, e.g., Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Adams, 304 F.R.D. 672, 673 (S.D. Fla. 2015). “Good cause" is hard to define but “generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate

need to take judicial action" after balancing the interests involved. In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litig., 820 F. 2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987).

As in similar cases before this Court, Strike3 shows good cause. Strike

Because multiple persons may use a single IP address, the subscriber might not be the alleged infringer. Considering the nature of the alleged copyrighted material, procedural protections—as encouraged by Strike3 itself, Doc. 7 at 14—are necessary to avoid undue embarrassment.

The Court grants Strike3's motion, Doc. 7, and permits Strike3 to immediately serve the subpoena provided with the motion, Doc. 7-4, using the following procedural protections.

1. Strike3 must include with the subpoena a copy of the complaint, Doc. 1, and this order.

2. Strike3 must follow its practices described in its motion under the heading “Strike3 Brings its Litigation in Good Faith," Doc. 7 at 5–6.

3. Pending further order, neither party may file anything with the Court identifying the defendant by name. For a summons, Strike3 should call the clerk's office at (904) 549- 1900, request a blank summons, and complete the summons itself.

4. Within twenty-eight days of receiving from Comcast the name and address of the subscriber, Strike3 must provide a copy of this order to the subscriber. The subscriber may obtain legal counsel. Anything the subscriber says or provides might be used against the subscriber.

5. If the parties resolve the dispute, Strike3 must expeditiously effect dismissal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

6. If the parties do not resolve the dispute and the defendant wants to remain anonymous, the defendant must move to proceed anonymously with the defendant's first filing, satisfying the standard for proceeding anonymously described in Plaintiff B v. Francis, 631 F. 3d 1310, 1315-16 (11th Cir. 2011).

Ordered in Jacksonville, Florida, on April 8, 2025.

PATRICIA D. BARKSDALE United States Magistrate Judge

[fn 1]: In the motion, Strike3 asks for leave to subpoena “Comcast Cable." Doc. 7 at 1. The proposed subpoena is to “Comcast Cable Communications, LLC.” Doc. 7-4 at 1. Strike3 provides no explanation for the difference.

[fn 2]: Having received no adversarial briefing, the Court does not hold that Strike3 actually states a claim for copyright infringement.

Footnotes
3 appears to state a claim for copyright infringement. [fn 2] See Doc. 1 (complaint). Strike 3 seeks limited information (only a name and an address). See Doc. 7-4 at 1 (proposed subpoena). And Strike 3 shows it cannot pursue this litigation without the information. See Doc. 7-2 ¶ 28 (Patrick Paige's declaration).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw