GLORIA ARIAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
GLORIA ARIAS, APPELLANT,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
528 So. 2d 25
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Caution
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Rejecting the appellant’s contentions, we find first that evidence that the plaintiffs driver was acting in a sudden emergency supports the jury’s conclusion that she did not negligently operate her vehicle, so that the plaintiff was not entitled to a directed verdict on liability. 4 Fla.Jur.2d Automobiles and Other Vehicles § 233 (1978). Second, the allegedly improper final argument of counsel did not justify either the declaration of a mistrial below or the award of a new trial here. Gonzalez v. State, 511 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Irv David v. Richman, 568 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1990)…EHRLICH, Justice. We have for review David v. Richman, 528 So. 2d 25, 27 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance: Whether a party is precluded from claiming attorney’s fees under a contract which has been found to have never existed. We ha…
-
Martin v. Jack Yanks Constr. Co., 650 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…iable claim for those costs and attorney’s fees associated with the removal of the fraudulent Hen. See § 713.31(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1993). For the foregoing reasons, the judgment under review is reversed with directions. . See also David v. Richman, 528 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (no meeting of minds existed on material elements of contract for sale of real estate which did not include legal description of property and which left material portions of com tract blank); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So. 2d 936 (Fl…
-
Zell v. Cobb, 566 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…o the appellees.5 See Webster Lumber Co. v. Lincoln, 94 Fla. 1097, 115 So. 498 (1927) (several writings at issue did not constitute binding contract, even where deposit paid, since there was no meeting of minds on essential terms); David v. Richman, 528 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (no meeting of minds existed on material elements of contract for sale of real estate which did not include legal description of property and which left material portions of contract blank); Theocles v. Lytras, 518 So. 2d 936 (Fla…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gonzalez v. State, 511 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)