MCFALLS
v.
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.

M.D. Fla. | 2025-03-05
No. 2:23-cv-572
2025 FFL 5357 District Court, M.D. Florida (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court accepted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting class certification in part and denying it in part.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sought class certification for nurses subject to a fellowship program employment agreement and training repayment provisions. The Magistrate…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Before the Court are Plaintiff Lauren McFalls' Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 94) and United States Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 121). Judge Dudek recommends granting the motion in part and denying it in part. No party objected, so the matter is ripe for review.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part," a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the report and recommendation de novo. See

Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Instead, when parties don't object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App'x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain"; (3) “it affected substantial rights"; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings." Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F. 3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999).

After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the Court finds no plain error. It accepts and adopts the R&R in full. Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. Judge Dudek's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 121) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the findings incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 94) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART:

a. Plaintiff's request to certify a class under FDUTPA of “[a]ll nurses who are or were subject to NCH's Specialty Fellowship Program Employment Agreement and the training repayment provisions therein at any point from July 31, 2019, through" the date of certification is GRANTED;

b. Plaintiff's request to certify the same class under Florida's Declaratory Judgment Act is DENIED;

c. the Court appoints Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Towards Justice, and Varnell & Warwick as class counsel to represent the certified class; and d. Plaintiff's motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks any further relief.

3. On or before March 12, 2025, Plaintiff must file a new notice consistent with the final class as certified.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on March 5, 2025.

Sheri Polster Chappell

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw