DEPPE
v.
VETTER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted Plaintiff's motion to stay proceedings to allow amendment of the complaint, but denied Defendants' motion to stay the case management conference.
Defendants moved to stay the case management conference deadline. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, moved to stay proceedings to amend his complaint and c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
so requires."). Given Plaintiff's intended motion to amend, the court finds that a brief stay of these proceedings is warranted. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997) ("The [d]istrict [c]ourt has broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own docket."). However, the court denies Defendants' motion to stay at this time. Defendants may raise a subsequent motion to stay after they file their intended dispositive motions.
Accordingly:
1. Defendants' Motion to Stay and Reschedule Case Management Conference (Dkt. 76) is DENIED.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Proceedings for Plaintiff to Correct Deficiencies in Causes of Actions in First Amended Complaint and Move for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 149) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff shall move to amend his complaint on or before March 17, 2025. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. (See Dkt. 8.)
4. This case is STAYED until March 17, 2025.
ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, on February 26, 2025.
JULIE S. SNEED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (U.S. 1997)
- Chrysler Int'l Corp. v. Chemaly, 280 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir. 2002)