HARRIS, JR.
v.
MATSBERIDZE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendants' notice of removal was insufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy.
Defendants removed the case to federal court invoking diversity jurisdiction, but failed to sufficiently allege that the parties were citizens of diff…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Domicile Vs. Residence cases and more on FLexlaw
Even in the absence of a challenge, the Court has a duty to independently evaluate subject matter jurisdiction. _Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp._, 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006). Upon review of this case, the Court finds that the jurisdictional allegations are lacking. Defendants invoke diversity of citizenship but have not sufficiently alleged that the parties are citizens of different states or sufficiently established the amount in controversy. _See_ Doc. 1; _cf._ 28 U.S.C. § 1441; 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).
Defendants' notice of removal states that Plaintiff should be presumed to be a Florida citizen. Doc. 1 ¶ 12. The legal and factual support are insufficient. Defendants argue that residence is presumed to be a person's domicile, but this is not the proper standard.¹ _See Taylor v. Appleton_, 30 F. 3d 1365, 1367 (11th
Cir. 1995) (“Citizenship, not residence, is the key fact that must be alleged in the complaint to establish diversity for a natural person."). The only factual support for Plaintiff's residency is a redacted police report listing Plaintiff's address as Jacksonville, but Defendants also claim Plaintiff is a resident of Lee County without providing support. _Compare_ Doc. 1 ¶ 11, _with_ Doc. 1 ¶ 12. The police report listing Plaintiff's address is not enough.
Second, Defendants fail to show the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00. Defendants cite to the state civil cover sheet, but this does not properly establish the amount in controversy. _See Martinez-Lopez v. Bowden_, No. 3:23-cv-36-TJC-LLL, 2024 WL 1252381 (M.D. Fla. March 25, 2024). Defendants assert that Plaintiff's pre-suit demand was in excess of the jurisdictional amount, but do not present any support. _See_ Doc. 1 ¶ 24. The bare assertion is insufficient. "A removing defendant bears the burden of proving proper jurisdiction.” _Leonard v. Enter. Rent a Car_, 279 F. 3d 967, 972 (11th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted). When a plaintiff pleads a non-specific amount of damages, the defendant(s) may use additional evidence or documents outside of the record to prove by a preponderance of evidence that removal is proper. _See_ _Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc._, 608 F. 3d 744, 754-55, 759, 765–68 (11th
¹ Defendants purport to quote language from _Jones v. Law Firm of Hill_ _and Ponton_, but the language is a paraphrase and not a quote. 141 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 1355 (M.D. Fla. 2001). The _Jones_ court also states any presumption is merely an aid to Court. _Id._; _see also Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield_, 490 U.S. 30, 48 (1989) (noting domicile and residence are not synonymous).
Cir. 2010) (describing various evidentiary materials upon which defendants may rely to support the amount in controversy).
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED:
Defendants are directed to file a jurisdictional supplement up to seven pages no later than March 7, 2025. If Defendants do not supplement the notice of removal, the Court will remand the case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida, the 20th day of February, 2025.
/s/ Timothy J. Corrigan
TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN
Senior United States District Judge
ddw Copies: Counsel of record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500 (U.S. 2006)
- Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc., 608 F.3d 744 (11th Cir. 2010)
- Taylor v. Appleton, 30 F.3d 1365 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1989)
- Leonard v. Enter. Rent A CAR, 279 F.3d 967 (11th Cir. 2002)
- Jones v. Law Firm of Hill & Ponton, 141 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (M.D. Fla. 2001)