WHITEHEAD
v.
FLORIDA DELIVERY SERVICES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this employment discrimination case, the District Court for the Middle District of Florida adopted a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, awarding default judgment against Florida Delivery Services, Inc. for pregnancy discrimination under Title VII and the FCRA. The court granted in part plaintiff's motion for entry of default final judgment on damages, awarding back pay, compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney's fees, and costs totaling $28,756.
The court awarded plaintiff $5,650 in back pay, $5,000 in compensatory damages, $10,000 in punitive damages, $7,480 in attorney's fees, and $626 in costs, for a total default judgment of $28,756 against FDS. The magistrate judge properly reduced certain damage categories while awarding punitive damages in full.
[1] A court reviews a magistrate judge's report and recommendation de novo in the absence of an objection.
[2] A motion for default judgment on damages may be granted in part and denied in part.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The magistrate judge found in a prior order, which was adopted by this Court, that Plaintiff demonstrated liability against her employer Florida Delivery Services, Inc. ("FDS") for her claims of pregnancy discrimination under Title VII and the FCRA.”
Establishes that liability had been previously determined and the current order addresses only the damages phase.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff Anna Whitehead brought claims of pregnancy discrimination against her employer, Florida Delivery Services, Inc. (FDS). In a prior order adop…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pregnancy Discrimination cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court is Plaintiff Anna Whitehead's Third Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment on the Issue of Damages (Dkt. 48) and United States Magistrate Judge Tuite's well-reasoned and thorough report and recommendation (Dkt. 49). Judge Tuite held an evidentiary hearing and now recommends that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. The time for filing objections has passed.
The Court reviews the legal conclusions de novo in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 F. App'x 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). The magistrate judge found in a prior order, which was adopted by this Court, that Plaintiff demonstrated liability against her employer Florida Delivery Services, Inc. ("FDS") for her claims of pregnancy discrimination under Title VII and the
FCRA. This third motion addresses damages. After an evidentiary hearing, the magistrate judge properly reduced back pay, compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and costs, and appropriately awarded punitive damages in the full amount sought. For the reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court rules as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 49) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and made a part of this order.
2. Plaintiff's third motion for default judgment on the issue of damages (Dkt. 48) is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in more detail in the Report and Recommendation at docket 49. Plaintiff is awarded $5,650 in back pay, $5,000 in compensatory damages, $10,000 in punitive damages, $7,480 in attorney's fees, and $626 in costs. The motion is otherwise denied.
3. The Clerk is directed to enter final default judgment in favor of Ms. Whitehead and against FDS in the total amount of $28,756.
4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on December 11, 2024.
/s/ William F. Jung
WILLIAM F. JUNG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
COPIES FURNISHED TO: Counsel of record
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (U.S. 1949)
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1964)
- Marina Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603 (11th Cir. 1994)
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196 (U.S. 1988)
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Celina Mestre, 701 F.2d 1365 (11th Cir. 1983)
- LaCHANCE v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc., 146 F.3d 832 (11th Cir. 1998)
- Atl. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n OF FT. Lauderdale v. Blythe Eastman Paine Webber, 890 F.2d 371 (11th Cir. 1989)
- Rinaldo v. Corbett, 256 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2001)
- Williams v. A.L. Bishop, 732 F.2d 885 (11th Cir. 1984)