CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
VACUUM DIG ENTERPRISES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant the motion for default judgment.
Plaintiffs moved for default judgment, and the Magistrate Judge recommended granting the motion. No party objected to the recommendation.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Report And Recommendation cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 14) and United States Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15). Judge Dudek recommends that Plaintiffs' Motion be granted. No party objected, so the matter is ripe for review.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part," the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Instead, when parties don't object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded
by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App'x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain"; (3) “it affected substantial rights"; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings." Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F. 3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999).
After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the Court finds no plain error. It accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation in full.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
1. United States Magistrate Judge Kyle C. Dudek's Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the findings incorporated herein.
2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgement is GRANTED as to Count I (breach of contract) and Count IV (violating Fla. Stat. § 68.065).
3. Counts II and III are deemed abandoned.
4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment for Plaintiffs in the amount of $145,855.60 for Count I, plus prejudgment interest at $18.98 per day from November 22, 2022, through the date of judgment, as well as $206,448.04 for Count IV.
5. Plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees and costs is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs may file a motion seeking such relief with sufficient supporting documentation pursuant to Local Rule 7.01.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on December 2, 2024.
Sheri Polster Rappell
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record
3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1985)
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)
- Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 197 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 1999)