ALONSO
v.
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (PASCO COUNTY)
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jesse Alonso, a Florida prisoner, filed a pro se petition for federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction for resisting an officer with violence. The district court dismissed the petition as premature because Alonso had not exhausted available state court remedies, as his direct appeal was still pending and he had not completed postconviction review.
The petition was dismissed without prejudice as premature because Alonso failed to exhaust his state-court remedies. Federal courts cannot grant habeas relief until state prisoners have given state courts one full opportunity to resolve constitutional issues by completing the established appellate review process.
[1] A federal court cannot grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner until the prisoner has exhausted all available remedies in state court.
[2] Exhaustion of state remedies requires a petitioner to provide state courts with one complete opportunity to resolve constitutional issues through the established appellat…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[QUOTE REDACTED — failed verbatim audit (paraphrase, not verbatim). See original_text for the text as originally displayed.]”
Establishes the exhaustion requirement under O'Sullivan v. Boerckel that must be satisfied before federal habeas relief can be granted
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAlonso was sentenced on September 27, 2023, to ten years for resisting an officer with violence. His direct appeal was pending in the Florida Second D…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Habeas Corpus cases and more on FLexlaw
Jesse Alonso is a Florida prisoner serving a ten-year sentence for resisting an officer with violence.¹ He initiated this action by filing a *pro se* document titled “Motion Collateral Review," which the Court liberally construes as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). After careful review, the petition is dismissed without prejudice as premature. *See* Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitioner.”).
A petitioner must exhaust the remedies available in state court before a federal court can grant habeas relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). To satisfy the exhaustion requirement, "state prisoners must give the state courts one full opportunity to resolve any constitutional 1 It appears that Mr. Alonso is also serving time for other offenses, but his petition mentions only his conviction for resisting an officer with violence. (Doc. 1 at 1-2). Accordingly, the Court construes the petition as attacking that conviction alone.
issues by invoking one complete round of the State's established appellate review process." *O'Sullivan v. Boerckel*, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999). Mr. Alonso was sentenced on September 27, 2023. *State v. Alonso*, No. 2019-CF-130, Doc. 130 (Fla. 6th Jud. Cir. Ct.). His direct appeal remains pending, *Alonso v. State*, No. 2D23-2304 (Fla. 2d DCA), and he has yet to complete the first round of state postconviction review, *State v. Alonso*, No. 2019-CF-130 (Fla. 6th Jud. Cir. Ct.). Because Mr. Alonso has failed to exhaust his state-court remedies, his § 2254 petition is premature. *See Wright v. Warden, Fla. Women's Reception Ctr.*, No. 3:23-cv-1077-MMH-LLL, 2023 WL 6064327, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2023) (“Wright's direct appeal has not yet concluded; therefore, the [§ 2254] Petition is premature."). Once Mr. Alonso's state-court proceedings conclude, he may challenge his conviction through a federal petition under § 2254.
Accordingly, Mr. Alonso's petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice as premature.² To the extent that a certificate of appealability is required to appeal from this order, Mr. Alonso fails to make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," and thus a certificate of appealability and leave to appeal *in forma pauperis* are DENIED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The CLERK is directed to CLOSE this case.
DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on October 21, 2024.
Welln
WILLIAM F. JUNG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2 This dismissal does not excuse Mr. Alonso from the one-year statute of limitation for federal habeas petitions. *See* 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). The one-year period is tolled while a properly filed application for state postconviction relief is pending, but the time in which a federal habeas petition is pending does not toll the one-year period. *Duncan v. Walker*, 533 U.S. 167, 172 (2001); *Artuz v. Bennett*, 531 U.S. 4, 8-9 (2000).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838 (U.S. 1999)
- Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (U.S. 2001)
- Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4 (U.S. 2000)
- Moreno Mujica v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr. (Pasco County) (M.D. Fla. 2024)