CALVIN LEE SELF, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while a flight instruction contained an erroneous mandatory term, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, but the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant above the recommended guidelines as a habitual offender.
The defendant was convicted of grand theft. The trial court gave a mandatory flight instruction and sentenced the defendant in excess of the recommend…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Flight Instruction cases and more on FLexlaw
PARKER, Judge.
Self appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft, alleging the trial court erred: (1) in granting the state’s requested flight instruction; and (2) sentencing Self in excess of the recommended guidelines sentence. We affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing.
The jury received the following flight instruction:
If you believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant fled or sought to flee when he saw the officers, you must consider that as a circumstance pointing to guilt. (Emphasis supplied).
The instruction should have stated “may” instead of “must.” See Blackwell v. State, 79 Fla. 709, 86 So. 224 (1920). However, we find the state has met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the error of the trial court did not contribute to the verdict. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
As to Self’s second issue, the state concedes the trial court committed error in sentencing Self pursuant to the habitual offender statute in excess of the presumptive guidelines sentence. Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1986).
We, therefore, affirm the conviction, but reverse and remand to sentence Self within the recommended range under sentencing guidelines. Shull v. Dugger, 515 So. 2d 748 (Fla.1987).
Affimed in part. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. DiGUILIO, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986)
- Whitehead v. State, 498 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1986)
- Shull v. Dugger, 515 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1987)
- Will Blackwell and Robert Blackwell v. The State of Floirda, 79 Fla. 709 (Fla. 1920)