EUGENE JUNIOR LECORN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EUGENE JUNIOR LECORN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
528 So. 2d 538
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
LeCom’s sentence is affirmed on the authority of McKinley v. State, 519 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider the restitution issue.
SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rice v. State, 546 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…tences was error1 under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(1) which mandates that one score-sheet be prepared for all offenses pending before the court for sentencing. Washington v. State, 539 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Ford v. State, 528 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Arnett v. State, 526 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). See also, Stokes v. State, 512 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hagins v. State, 509 So. 2d 1244 (Fla.2d DCA 1987). In Gallagher v. State, 476 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985),…
-
Goss v. State, 569 So. 2d 1390 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ts the sentencing court erred in using only one guideline scoresheet when sentencing appellant for two crimes. Appellant cites no authority for his position and failed to advise this court of cases directly against his position. See Ford v. State, 528 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Gallagher v. State, 476 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). He also failed to recognize and attempt to deal with a specific rule of criminal procedure governing the proper procedure. Rule 3.701(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Proce…
Authorities Cited
- McKINLEY v. State, 519 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)