COLONIAL VAN LINES INC.
v.
AAA COLONIAL VAN LINES, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that service on an individual defendant's co-resident at their residential address was proper, but service on a corporate defendant by serving the registered agent's co-resident at the agent's residential address was not proper.
Plaintiff sought clerk's default against defendants for failure to appear after being served. Service on individual defendant Jeff O. Counsel was made…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Service Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof (the “Motion”) (Doc. 20), filed July 8, 2024. In the Motion, Plaintiff seeks default against Defendants AAA Colonial Van Lines, Inc. (“AAA Colonial") and Jeff O. Counsel ("Counsel") (collectively, "Defendants”). Upon consideration, the Motion is due to be granted in part.
I.
BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a Complaint against the Defendants on January 26, 2024, seeking injunctive and other relief under both Florida law and the Federal Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq. (Doc. 1 | 1.) On March 23, 2024, the summonses and Complaint were served on Counsel and AAA Colonial, by an individual qualified to perfect service who handed a copy of the summons and Complaint to Sandra T., Counsel's adult co-resident, at Counsel's residential address. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff now seeks entry of a clerk's default against Defendants for failure to appear in this case. (Doc. 20.) II.
STANDARD "When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Before the clerk may enter default, he or she must determine that effective service has been made on the defaulting defendant because, without effective service, there is no jurisdiction and no obligation to answer or “otherwise defend.” See Kelly v. Florida, 233 Fed. App'x 883, 885 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished).
III.
DISCUSSION Defendants have not responded to Plaintiff's Complaint or otherwise appeared, and the time to do so has expired. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a) (providing that a defendant must file a responsive pleading to a complaint within 21 days after being served a copy of the summons and the complaint). The Court must now determine whether Plaintiff perfected service on either Defendant. The undersigned first takes up whether Counsel's service was proper as an individual defendant. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an individual defendant may be served by: following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made; or doing any of the following: delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individually personally; leaving a copy of each at the individual's dwelling or usual abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there; or delivering a copy of each to an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1)–(2)(A-C).
Under Florida law, an individual may be served by: delivering a copy of [the summons], to the person to be served with a copy of the complaint, petition, or other initial pleading or paper or by leaving the copies at his or her usual place of abode with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents.
Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a). First Response Process Corporation confirmed that 913 Samms Avenue, Port Orange, Florida 32129 was Counsel's residential address by conducting a skip trace search at the time service was completed. (Doc. 20 at 3.) According to the Affidavit of Service, Counsel's co-resident, Sandra T., who is of suitable age, was served a copy of the summons and Complaint, and informed of the contents, at the address listed above, by an individual qualified to perfect service. (Doc.