MARY STROUD AND ROBERT STROUD, APPELLANTS,
v.
INDUSTRIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
MARY STROUD AND ROBERT STROUD, APPELLANTS,
INDUSTRIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
528 So. 2d 550
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Caution
Cited by 21 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Berryer v. Hertz, 522 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Yohanan v. deClaire, 435 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); East Coast Insurance Company v. Cooper, 415 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); AGB Oil Co. v. Crystal Exploration and Production Company, 406 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Smith, 366 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Ritchie, 181 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brock v. Newman Brock, 690 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…gment, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. . It appears the parties had been filing separate tax returns. . See Brotman v. Brotman, 528 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 597 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); § 61.075(5)(a), Fla.Stat. (1995). . § 61.076, Fla.Stat. (1995); Vaccaro v. Vaccaro, 677 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). . Kirkland v. Kirkland, 618 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 5t…
-
Cole v. Roberts, 661 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…payment of $120,000.00, were purely marital assets. The funds were commingled when they were deposited in the IBM Credit Union checking account used by the parties throughout the marriage to pay all of their marital expenses. In Brotman v. Brotman, 528 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), we held that a husband’s severance pay and earned vacation pay (even when received after the parties are separated) are assets acquired during the marriage. We agree with appellant that it is inconsistent for the wife to be resp…
-
Hogle v. Hogle, 535 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…or or breach of discretion in the trial judge’s failure to impute income to Edmund, based on his Army earnings, skills and degree. Those things are only indicia of earning ability. They do not establish it as a matter of law. See Brotman v. Brotman, 528 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). In order to impute income, the trial judge must find that the parent owing a duty of support has the actual ability to earn more than he or she is currently earning, and that he or she is deliberately refusing to work at that hi…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- AGB OIL Co. v. Crystal Exploration & Prod. Co., 406 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Smith, 366 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. William Ritchie et ux., 181 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
- E. Coast Ins. Co. v. Cooper, 415 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Donna deClaire Yohanan v. George F. deCLAIRE, 435 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- Berryer v. HERTZ, 522 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)