ROTHSCHILD
v.
PFIZER CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopts the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, dismissing the action.
Plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit against Pfizer and other defendants. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending dismi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Magistrate Judge'S Report And Recommendation Review cases and more on FLexlaw
Before the Court is Judge Kyle C. Dudek's Report and Recommendation (“R & R"). (Doc. 19). Judge Dudek recommends that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not objected to the R & R, and the time to do so has expired. The R & R is ripe for review.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part," a magistrate judge's R & R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review the
R & R de novo. See Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F. 2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). Instead, when parties don't object, a district court need only correct plain error as demanded by the interests of justice. See, e.g., Symonette v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App'x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-52 (1985). Plain error exists if (1) “an error occurred”; (2) “the error was plain"; (3) “it affected substantial rights"; and (4) “not correcting the error would seriously affect the fairness of the judicial proceedings." Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 197 F. 3d 1322, 1329 (11th Cir. 1999).
After careful consideration and an independent review of the case, the Court finds no plain error. So, it accepts and adopts the R & R in full.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:
1. Judge Dudek's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and the findings incorporated herein.
2. This action is DISMISSED.
3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to any pending motions as moot, terminate all deadlines, and close the case.
DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on August 30, 2024.
Sheri Polster Rappell
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies: All Parties of Record 2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 (11th Cir. 1993)
- Farley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 197 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 1999)