RAUL DAIZI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, EX REL. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1988-07-27
Nos. 87-2953, 88-0060
ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
528 So. 2d 554 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus. Upon consideration the petition is

DENIED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bell v. State, 545 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 1989)
    …PER CURIAM. In Bell v. State, 528 So. 2d 554, 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), the district court certified the following question of great public importance: WHERE A TRIAL JUDGE FINDS THAT THE UNDERLYING REASONS FOR VIOLATION OF PROBATION CONSTITUTE MORE THAN A MINOR INFRACTION AND ARE SUFFICIENTLY…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw