LOCHREN
v.
HORNE LLP
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, granting the parties' motion for initial approval of their collective action settlement agreement.
The parties jointly moved for initial approval of their Third Amended Collective Action Settlement Agreement. The Magistrate Judge recommended grantin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Flsa Collective Action cases and more on FLexlaw
The parties jointly move for initial approval of their Third Amended Collective Action Settlement Agreement. (Dkt. 89.) Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price recommends that the motion be granted. (Dkt. 93.) The parties have no objection to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. (Dkt. 94.)
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. The failure to timely object to the proposed findings and recommendations “waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions." 11th Cir. R. 3-1; see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Even in the absence of an objection, the district judge reviews any legal conclusions de novo. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F. 3d 603,
604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019).
Upon conducting a careful and complete review of the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the court adopts the report and recommendation in full.
Accordingly:
1. The Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Dkt. 93) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
2. The parties' motion (Dkt. 89) is GRANTED.
3. This matter is CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED as a FLSA collective action for settlement purposes only, with the collective defined as: All QA/QC Specialists or Eligibility Analysts on the Texas Rental Relief Program who worked for Defendant within three years prior to the filing of this lawsuit to the approval date.
4. The parties' Amended Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 89-1) is
PRELIMINARILY APPROVED.
5. The notice and administration process in the Amended Settlement Agreement is AUTHORIZED.
6. On or before September 6, 2024, the parties shall file a joint motion for final settlement approval. This motion shall include all completed Claims Administration Forms, any objections from the potential opt-ins, and a request for final approval of an award of attorney fees to Plaintiffs'
counsel. The parties shall support the motion with citation to legal authority and shall address in the motion the issues outlined in the report and recommendation.
ORDERED in Orlando, Florida, on August 9, 2024.
JULIE S. SNEED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record