JEAN DICKSON AND SAMUEL DICKSON, APPELLANTS,
v.
FLANIGAN'S ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLEE
JEAN DICKSON AND SAMUEL DICKSON, APPELLANTS,
FLANIGAN'S ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLEE
528 So. 2d 961
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Kessler v. Gumenick, 358 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Freeburg v. Freeburg, 596 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…court, the father’s challenge to them is groundless. The apparent gravamen of the father’s complaint before us is that he was denied due process because no pleadings leading to the loss of his visitation rights had been filed. See Cenate v. Cenate, 528 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Sardinas v. Sardinas, 401 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We reject that argument, however, on the ground that the father specifically requested a hearing, albeit in a letter which the trial court apparently treated as a motion…
-
Heier v. Heier, 662 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…ustody. A permanent change of custody could only be ordered after proper pleadings have been filed and the opposing party duly noticed of the relief being sought. See Sardinas v. Sardinas, 401 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Brago; Cenate v. Cenate, 528 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). With this caveat, the order on appeal is otherwise affirmed in all respects. WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.…
-
Johnson v. McDONALD, 640 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
Authorities Cited
- Kessler v. Gumenick, 358 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)