POSITANO PLACE AT NAPLES III CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
v.
EMPIRE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that it cannot dictate the specific form of an appraisal award beyond what is agreed upon in the insurance policy, but the award must consider the policy's provisions and Florida law.
Following Hurricane Irma damage, the parties were ordered to appraisal. They now dispute the required form of the appraisal award, submitting competin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appraisal Provision cases and more on FLexlaw
This Hurricane Irma case involves damage to a condominium complex. After the parties were ordered to appraisal, Defendant appealed. (Doc. 61.) The case is now back and ready to proceed, but the parties cannot agree on the form of the appraisal award. They made their arguments on this issue at several hearings. (Docs. 119, 125.) And they have submitted briefs concerning the appraisal form, as well as competing forms. (Docs. 132, 133.) Both parties profess that their appraisal form complies with the Policy and Florida law.
Dictating the form of the appraisal award would likely benefit the Court (and the parties) in any future coverage dispute. But that cannot be done without the Court effectively “rewriting the parties' Policy to add conditions
for the appraisal process that were not part of [their] bargain.” Creekside Crossing Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2:20-CV-136-JLB- MRM, 2022 WL 962743, at *8 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2022); see also Intervest Const. of Jax, Inc. v. Gen. Fid. Ins. Co., 133 So. 3d 494, 497 (Fla. 2014) (“Courts may not rewrite contracts, add meaning that is not present, or otherwise reach results contrary to the intentions of the parties.”).
That said, the appraisal provision cannot be read in a vacuum. It is part of a larger contract that dictates the coverages and exclusions applicable to any loss. The parties' Policy must be taken into account as part of appraisal. Otherwise, the rest of the bargain becomes illusory. Accordingly, the appraisal award must be made with full consideration of the provisions, exclusions, and other terms of the Policy, as well as Florida law. Any party that uses a form not accounting for these items does so at its own peril.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The parties' memorandums in support of appraisal form (Docs. 132,
133) are GRANTED to the extent consistent with this Order. The memos are DENIED to the extent that they seek any different or greater relief.
2. This case will remain STAYED pending appraisal.
3. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint report on the status of appraisal by September 28, 2024, and every ninety days after until appraisal has ended.
2
4. Within 15 days of a signed appraisal award, the parties are DIRECTED to jointly notify the Court of (a) what issues, if any, remain for the Court to resolve; (b) whether the stay needs to be lifted; and (c) how this action should proceed, if at all.
ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on July 1, 2024.
Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge
Copies: All Parties of Record
3
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Creekside Crossing Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…ore would “effectively ‘rewrit[e] the parties' Policy to add conditions for the appraisal process that were not part of [their] bargain.” (Id. at 2-3) (quoting Creekside Crossing Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2:20-CV-136-JLB-MRM, 2022 WL 962743, at *8 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2022)). Therefore, the Magistrate Judge did not err, and the objection is overruled. II. Whether the Magistrate Judge's Order goes beyond the scope of the policy requirements. Creekside Crossing objects to the Magistrate…
-
…hat doing so here would enable Defendant to better challenge elements of the award. But not all courts have taken this approach to appraisal forms. See, e.g., Creekside Crossing Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2:20- CV-136-JLB-MRM, 2022 WL 962743, at *8 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2022) (denying a request to impose a line-item appraisal form). Judge Dudek's ruling is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: ---PAGE 3--- Defendant's Objection (Doc. 140) is OVERRULE…
-
…hat doing so here would enable Defendant to better challenge elements of the award. But not all courts have taken this approach to appraisal forms. See, e.g., Creekside Crossing Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Empire Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2:20- CV-136-JLB-MRM, 2022 WL 962743, at *8 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 31, 2022) (denying a request to impose a line-item appraisal form). Judge Dudek's ruling is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 2 ---PAGE 3--- Defendant's Objection (Doc. 139) is OVERR…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Intervest Constr. OF JAX, Inc. v. Gen. Fid. Ins. Co., 133 So. 3d 494 (Fla. 2014)