ARZELL BROWN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nolo Contendere Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Arzell Brown, Jr. appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at his withdrawal of plea hearing in March 1987. Specifically, Brown alleged that counsel was ineffective for advising him that he could not elect guidelines sentencing if he went to trial instead of pleading nolo contendere to the charges against him. The trial court denied Brown’s motion without an evidentiary hearing and in its order incorporated by reference the state’s attachments to its response to Brown’s motion. None of these attachments conclusively refutes Brown’s allegation, which presents a factual issue. See Hyer v. State, 501 So. 2d 189 (Fla.2d DCA 1987).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain appellate review.
RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Avery Simmons v. State, 541 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…benefit of the court on remand, that it was error to allow testimony regarding a marijuana cigarette found in the room. Cf. Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959); Richardson v. State, 528 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). It was also error to give a principals instruction where the only charge against the defendant was the (constructive) possession of the drugs found in the room based on the [*172] defendant’s individual occupancy and control. We…
-
Carr v. State, 578 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…er admission of the cash invited conjecture on the part of the jury that Jackson was involved in other unproven criminal conduct, making it more likely that he could be guilty of the charged offense. 570 So. 2d at 1389. See also Richardson v. State, 528 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In the instant case, the trial court admitted evidence of appellant’s prior conviction for possession of cocaine for the purpose of showing knowledge of cocaine. Here, as in Keen and Jackson, the real jury issue was appellant’s…
-
Hawks v. State, 616 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…stimony of state's witness that defendant had given her cocaine and thereafter caused her to start selling cocaine to support her habit was not relevant to charges of trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine); Richardson v. State, 528 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (evidence of metal matchbox containing cocaine residue found on defendant at time of his arrest should not have been admitted in prosecution for possession and sale of cocaine, since matchbox was admitted solely to show propensit…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hyer v. State, 501 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
- White v. State, 501 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)